In August 1995, three years after Hurricane Andrew tore through the southern U.S. and devastated its coastal communities, co-ops there were still rebuilding and sorting through a maze of federal reimbursements and other paperwork left in the storm’s wake.
Amid the difficulties, and knowing that the next Andrew could be right around the corner, a handful of the region’s newer statewide safety and loss control directors got together in Biloxi, Mississippi, to see if they could find a better way.
That small, informal meeting would continue every August thereafter and eventually expanded to a consortium of 20 statewide associations. It’s still an informal gathering, with no name or charter, but the work they do has serious implications for co-op preparedness when disasters strike.
“The conversations focus on large-scale mutual aid challenges and how members of the co-op network respond,” says Martha Duggan, NRECA’s senior director of regulatory affairs.
“It gives the statewide storm coordinators an opportunity to talk about what worked well and what could have worked better, and it also provides a chance to plan for disaster-related challenges that we’ve learned to accept as certainties.”
The value of face to face
That first Biloxi meeting involved safety and loss coordinators from Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. Florida joined the following year.
After Andrew—a devastating Category 5 storm that cut a massive swath of destruction mainly through Florida and Louisiana—co-op rebuilding efforts brought more than 700 mutual assistance personnel to the region. Affected co-ops spent years sorting through reimbursement issues with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and coordinators began to see that unprecedented mutual aid challenges could not be managed in the same way as routine outages that required only a few days help from neighboring co-ops.
What those founding members also realized was that while the regular contacts among co-op peers are critical, it’s the deeper personal connections that help in building broad, long-term plans.
“There’s something about sharing a meal with someone and having face-to-face conversations that helps to build trust,” says Gerald Gordon, vice president of safety and loss control for the
Electric Cooperatives of Mississippi. “When we need to talk about complicated challenges in the midst of a crisis, we already have solid relationships and a lot of confidence in the information we’re getting from others on the conference call.”
The meeting has continued to be in Biloxi ever since, with the exception of 2005 and 2006, when damage from hurricanes Katrina and Rita forced them to move it, and this year when COVID-19 forced its cancellation.
Hurricane Katrina, which slammed into the Louisiana coast on August 29, 2005, and Hurricane Rita, which made landfall near the Texas-Louisiana state line three weeks later, were the greatest tests of the group’s then-10 years of work. The twin storms brought thousands of co-op staff and contractors to the region and led to more than four months of intensive mutual aid operations.
“Between the two storms, nearly 10,000 co-op personnel and contractors were involved, so it was a pretty long process,” says Mike Bergeaux, the recently retired director of loss control for the
Association of Louisiana Electric Cooperatives. “We would not have been able to rotate crews in and out and deal with some of the other widespread challenges without the coordination and planning that occurs at those meetings.”
As safety and loss managers for their statewide associations, many of the meeting participants also coordinate safety training for their member co-ops. They know the crew chiefs and most of the operations employees who are likely to volunteer for mutual assistance work, and they’re also familiar with the infrastructure and operational environments those crews most often encounter.
“We have some awareness of what’s available in a state beyond the limits of a local co-op,” says Peggy Dantzler, vice president of loss control and training for the
Electric Cooperatives of South Carolina. “With the help of our contacts in other states, we can broaden access to skills, equipment, and supplies that can really make a difference following major disasters.”
According to Dantzler, the Biloxi meetings offer opportunities to discuss things like changes that might affect interstate transportation or issues surrounding transmission access. The result: less time spent on basic issues when emergencies occur.
“When our conference calls take place related to anticipated events, we’ve often been able to arrange for several states to send out emergency transportation waivers that co-op crews will need to reach their destinations, avoiding costly delays,” Dantzler says.
Also addressed are local or regional circumstances that might affect the level of available mutual aid.
“We know that Louisiana’s co-ops can often field about 80 people, and Missouri is a state with a lot of resources, so they have committed about 300 when needed,” Bergeaux says. “Statewide coordinators have awareness of what each state can comfortably offer and what types of vehicles, equipment, and other specialty gear they can temporarily release without disrupting local or statewide operations.”
Shared expertise and technology
Over the years, the Biloxi meetings have also helped build consensus around the adoption of technologies that not only help co-ops during major restoration efforts but also improve response to local outages.
When he was vice president of safety and loss control for the Electric Cooperatives of Mississippi, Michael Weltzheimer helped develop software applications that many statewide associations now use in incident management for outages requiring mutual aid.
“Requesting help is as simple as logging in and telling us what the anticipated need is,” says Weltzheimer, who is now safety and loss prevention resource coordinator for
Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange. “With the names and skill sets of employees, and the equipment in reserve or available for temporary release already in the database, responding co-ops can quickly offer details on the help they’re able to provide.”
As co-op technology has improved, meeting principals also got involved in development of applications to help guide visiting crews and contractors.
“Crews traveling across seven states to get to where they’re needed can face climate conditions they’re not used to,” says Larry Detwiler, director of loss control, safety, and compliance at
Kansas Electric Cooperatives. “They need to know what types of supplies like seasonal clothing could be needed … awareness of the hazards they might be facing, particularly if they are working in terrain and weather conditions they are not really familiar with.”
The annual August meetings often include discussions about equipment availability, including portable substations, drones, and mobile mechanic shops. Software developed with encouragement from the group allows for tracking and assignment of crews and equipment. But protracted mutual aid efforts covering multiple co-op territories often require more than line crews, bucket trucks, and digger derricks.
“We’ve found ways to include warehouse people, administrative staffs, and operations managers and communicators in our scheduling app,” Detwiler says. “Knowing that qualified, committed staffers who understand how co-ops operate are available can give beleaguered managers the comfort to allow key staff … to see about their own families and take necessary breaks.”
And as more co-ops recognize the value of direct dialogue with members through social media, communicators who can step in remotely are being added to mutual aid rosters, says Joe McElroy, director of safety for the
Michigan Electric Cooperative Association.
“Co-ops are doing much better jobs getting information out when storms occur,” he says. “So supporting those efforts when the affected co-ops’ staffers need a break just makes sense.”
But as the technology available to electric co-ops and their members has improved, potential mutual aid needs have also expanded. Recent statewide storm coordinator meetings have included discussions about sharing incident details through social media outlets.
“Our outage information sites provide more information explaining to members the challenges we face with big outages,” Mississippi’s Gordon says. “What they don’t see are the features that allow us to use the co-op-facing side of those apps to manage crews.”
Instead of stacks of legal pads and note slips piled on desks at various locations, crews are assigned, deployed, and monitored in real time, and anyone who needs to track their locations or status has access to the same information.
“That mapping data can be shared with the co-ops and contractors sending in crews to help,” Gordon says. “We can tell them to log in to a mobile device, enter a job code number, and they have instant access to useful details.”
The disaster response software shared among the statewides also helps track vehicle mileage, personnel hours, equipment use, and other details included under mutual aid agreements, says South Carolina’s Dantzler.
“When a co-op has to complete paperwork for FEMA reimbursement, it’s clear what was charged for personnel and equipment,” she says. “That kind of detail not only helps the co-op but also helps provide details that save co-ops money.”
When COVID-19 pandemic concerns arose in March, statewide storm coordinators began holding weekly conference calls. They also held teleconferences in late June focused on ways to alter mutual assistance practices to meet the demands of social distancing and risk mitigation.
“The discussions centered around transportation, lodging, crew assignments, crews’ desires to stay closer to their homes, and how meals could be prepared and distributed,” NRECA’s Duggan says. And an expected FEMA policy shift from housing evacuees in emergency shelters like gymnasiums and armories to hotels could reduce room availability for visiting crews.
“Several statewides have already adopted travel restrictions requiring that mutual aid crews limit work to their home states or to areas where return to home each night is feasible,” Duggan says. “When distances are far and housing is needed for responding crews, they will be housed in individual rooms, rather than two per room. Room service is avoided, as is room cleaning to reduce the need for hotel staff to visit rooms.”
Practices adopted to promote social distancing, including the addition of leased vehicles to fleets to reduce the number of personnel traveling to worksites together, are also being included in large-scale mutual aid plans. And instead of communal meals, boxed meals are now being delivered to crews.
“Many managers have already expressed concerns about sending crews where they’d be required to stay overnight,” says Gordon, who dealt with the issue when more than 40 tornadoes ripped through his state Easter weekend. “When you have to disperse crews and handle most communications electronically, it can slow the pace of restoration, but it helps reduce the risks.”
Statewide officials have also discussed ways to scale up dispersed supply and scheduled fueling operations by staging materials in the territories of neighboring co-ops when big jobs are underway in storm-ravaged areas.
Still, pandemic issues affecting mutual assistance may lead to longer restoration times, which may lead to consumer-member dissatisfaction.
“We’ve got to make sure members understand that crews may be traveling more and spending less time on restoration, so some of the work could take longer,” says Kansas’s Detwiler. “These changes affect every aspect of mutual aid because visiting crews may never actually make it to the headquarters or district offices of the co-ops they’re helping. Restoring power safely means keeping the crews doing the work safe too.”